A New Language for Youth Ministry

The first few chapters of Andrew Root and  Kenda Creasy Dean‘s new book, The Theological Turn in Youth Ministry, deal with the need for a different vocabulary in the ways we, as a church, work with young people. I think the genius of these first chapters is that it acknowledges and encourages the intuition and experience of those of us who work with youth, while trying to establish some robust theological foundations to steer these intuitions. What this theological lexicon does is really help to make youth ministry a re-generative process. What I mean by that is this. If we see God’s actions throughout scripture as primarily acts of a minister, then how we talk about God (our theology) must reflect the practicality of God’s action. That is to say, our theology must have action and vice versa. If we see God as a minister of creation, incarnation, Pentecost etc. then our practice of ministry actually precedes theology. However, it is re-generative because it acts in circles.

We begin in the on-the-ground experience of ministry, theologically reflect on that ministry, which then impacts how we move forward in our new experiences of ministry with young people. Even though this sounds like a fairly basic motion of the “act-reflect-react” model. However, I think it’s significantly different because it seeks to connect to the heart of God’s ministry in the world.

It takes the responsibility of initiating creation off of us and frees us to participate in the world that God is continually creating.

I think so many people get burned out when we feel like we have to be the ones who are responsible for creating a ministry. But that’s not the case. Through Andy and Kenda’s insistence on theological reflection, we are free to observe where God is acting in our midst and then seek to participate and further that action.

Check out the book here.. I’ll probably do another post or two reacting to a couple more points in the book. It’s an absolutely worthwhile read and is chock full of rich, theological reflections that is absolutely worth reading and wrestling with.

Enjoy reading!

Cheers,
Eric

What is the Theological Turn in Youth Ministry?

The Theological Turn in Youth Ministry is the newest book from youth ministry people Andy Root & Kenda Creasy Dean. It’s a combination of different essays written by each of them dealing with a hope for a more robustly theological take on youth ministry. Most of the chapters are articles that have been previously-published, but updated for the book. It’s all fantastic stuff and really worth the time reading, not just for youth ministry, but for all ministry. I think we need a more theological look at the way in which we, as a church and the people who work in it, interact with people in our ministry.

Over the next week or so, I’ll be going through some great discussion points of the book and posting responses and thoughts on the ideas presented there. I’m not going to do a lot of summarizing of the chapters, because it’s kind of a waste of both my time and yours. Read the book. It’s very worthwhile. I think each chapter has different enough ideas where it would be worth it to engage in the conversation in an attempt to develop a more robustly theological (youth) ministry.

Cheers,
Eric

Is Our Struggle to Be “Contemporary” the Wrong Struggle?

I’ve seen churches spend millions in new campaigns to build state-of-the-art sanctuaries that are essentially movie theaters. Heck, I grew up in a church like that. And while it’s great when you’re a kid (because who doesn’t want to feel like they’re going to the movies instead of church?) I’m wondering if it’s a symptom of a bigger struggle of relevance. We try to be relevant, contemporary, GenX, emerging, etc. and it certainly speaks to a number of people. But I wonder if it’s a worthwhile tree to be climbing.

I heard a quote from Wendell Berry the other day that really stuck with me. Confession time: I love Wendell Berry. A lot of his stuff resonates with me and I find much of his writing to inspire a lot of what I do. This particular quote doesn’t need a lot of introduction, but is worth considering to those of us in ministry, particularly those of us who work with young people. It’s a bit long, but always worth it. He writes,

Contemporaneity, in the sense of being “up with the times,” is of no value. A competent wakefulness to experience — as well as to instruction and example — is another matter. But what we call the modern world is not necessarily, and not often, the real world, and there is no virtue in being up to date in it. It is a false world, based upon economies and values and desires that are fantastical — a world in which millions of people have lost any idea of the resources, the disciplines, the restraints, and the labor necessary to support human life, and who have thus become dangerous to their own lives and to the possibility of life. The job now is to get back to that other perennial and substantial world in which we really do live, in which the foundations of our life will be visible to us, and in which we can accept our responsibilities again within the conditions of necessity and mystery. In that world all competently wakeful and responsible people, dead, living, and unborn, are contemporaries. And that is the only contemporaneity worth having.” – Wendell Berry

So good.

How can we live in both worlds? I guess a more base question: Can we live in both worlds? How can we get back to the “perennial, substantial world in which… the foundations of our life will be visible to us” while still seeking a meaningful participation in this world? Is it a worthwhile struggle? Or a hippie fantasy? (I’ve thought both since I began this post).

What is our way forward as people of an ancient tradition in a world ruled by iEverythings?

Cheers,
Eric

Q&A with Mat Kearney

In the latest issue of Relevant Magazine, one of their writers sat down with singer-songwriter Mat Kearney to talk about his new album “Young Love”. Kearney has always had a unique blend of spoken word rhyming over his acoustic musings that have covered all manner of topics, including a lot about his faith. As you’ll read, his latest album has been his most personal endeavor and a worthwhile buy, if nothing else for his extremely catchy single “Hey Mama” and some other solid tracks. Without further ado, here’s the interview.

RM: You got married last summer. How did finding love and starting this new journey in your life impact you as an artist?

MK: Definitely as a muse. A lot of songs were written about us and our journey. When you decide to enter into a relationship like that, you learn your inconsistencies and your faults; it brings out a lot of different stuff about family and your own shortcomings. There are a lot of songs that came out of that. Just two people trying to connect, and two people trying to deal with themselves, and where they fall short and where they succeed. That’s what Young Love is about.

RM: What particular songs on Young Love are you really excited about?

MK: “Hey Mama” was a really exciting one because it helped spear the record. Instead of making a traditional singer-songwriter record, that song happened when I sat down and I was stomping and clapping. I made this groove with claps and this 808 and I started dancing around the room writing this song about meeting my wife. It really helped direct the record into the more program-y, more beat-driven direction. But then again [there’s a song called] “Ships In the Night” that I love. Probably the last song is really important to me. It’s called “Rochester,” and it’s this song I wrote about my family and my grandfather and my dad. It’s probably the most personal song I’ve ever written.

RM: That closing song seems whimsical and larger than life, but it’s obviously very intimate and personal to you. What prompted you to share that story about your family?

MK: I’m actually named Matthew William Kearney, my middle name is named after my grandfather. My grandfather raised my dad in Rochester, N.Y., and he had a fake cigar shop and he ran an illegal gambling ring out of the back of it. So my father had to live through that, and then the mob came to town when my dad was a freshman. They put my grandfather out of business because he was taking their business. So my dad had to live through that. And then he followed Pink Floyd through Europe for a while, then he became a lawyer. He moved to Hawaii where he was a deckhand on a boat and he met my mother—who was a mermaid on a glass-bottom boat. They were married and moved to Oregon, so I guess it’s this crazy story that’s better than you could make up. I sat down on this album and I said: “I’m going to only write songs that are within an arm’s reach. I’m not going to, like, write songs. I’m going to tell my story, and I’m going to tell the story of those around me.” The song ends with my father flushing a quarter pound of hash down the toilet as he’s looking at my older brother. It really kind of helped shape what I’ve become. I don’t know, it was obvious. I don’t know what I’ve never written it before, but all of a sudden I sat down with my guitar and it happened. It’s all true though, that’s the funny part. I didn’t make up any of that stuff.

RM: You tend to favor a storytelling approach when it comes to the topic of faith in your songs. Why is that?

MK: I think it’s part of the arena that I’m in. The arena I’ve kind of been placed in is this pop-culture market. I think the way I love talking about my faith is through my story because I think that’s all we have to work with sometimes. I think it’s the most moving way to share your story, too—is what you know, what you’ve seen, and heard, and tasted and felt. For me that’s always been a way—I’m just telling you what I know, and seen and heard, and there’s really no arguing with that. There’s power in that. For me, maybe it’s the path of least conflict or it’s the way that I’ve fallen into, but it’s what I’ve always done, ever since I started writing in high school. I’ve always kind of started in a story and jumped to these bigger metaphysical ideas in the daily, mundane things of trying to not fight with your girlfriend or something.

What’s next for you? When would you get back in the studio again?

MK: Hopefully not too soon. You’ve got to take time to live and breathe so you have something to write about so it’s coming from a genuine place. If there’s anything I learned on this record it’s that the songs that come out of life, that really resonate from the deepest places in you, are the ones that seem to stand up. The problem is there’s got to be some time for those songs to come; you can’t force them to come. They come as you listen, and meditate and pray, and wait for those songs, really. That’s the challenging part of what I do. You can’t just show up 9-5 and are guaranteed that a good song comes. Some of the songs fall out of the sky—they existed before I had it.

I really dig his down-to-earth approach to being an artist and the whole creative process. Have you heard Mat Kearney’s new disc? What do you think of it? If you haven’t, what do you like about his old stuff? If you haven’t heard of him, click on that link up there and check him out and get back to me.

Cheers,
Eric

People of Possibility

This is a few months old, but super good nonetheless. Check out Tripp Fuller (of the awesome Homebrewed Christianity podcast/blog) and one solution he sees to a problem in youth ministry. Enjoy!

[vimeo http://vimeo.com/23266345]
Some seriously solid stuff there. And the guy just cracks me up. Check out his blog and podcast for tons more awesome stuff.

Cheers,
Eric